| 程序与实体之间：美国公立大学录取纠纷司法审查标准研究 |
| Between Procedure and Substance:Study on Judicial Review Standards Applied in Admission Disputes among U.S. Public Universities |
| 摘要点击： 466 全文点击： 286 |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 中文关键词：录取纠纷 司法审查 实体性正当程序 裁量权滥用 |
| 英文关键词：admission dispute judicial review substantive due process discretion abuse |
| 基金项目：全国教育科学“十三五”规划2018 年度国家一般课题“高
等教育法治的国际比较与最新发展”（BFA180071） |
|
| 中文摘要： |
| 法院在审理公立大学录取纠纷案件时，如果仅适用单一审查标准，在特定情形中可能无法充分救
济学生权利。美国法院认可录取行为属于大学自治与学术自由范畴，但对其行使裁量权做出的评判结论并
非一概遵从。在实务中，法院亦基于行政法和宪法条款构造了由宽松至严苛的审查标准，根据不同案情解
决录取评价中出现的程序纠纷和分类纠纷，合理配置举证责任。我国法院有必要根据诉讼主张和案情事
实，适当提高司法审查强度，关注录取评价的实体性正当程序，甚至适度审视形成评判结论的逻辑过程，以
法律监督切实保障录取工作的公平正义。 |
| 英文摘要： |
| When court reviews admission disputes concerning public universities and applies one single
judicial review standard, student’s violated right might not be fully remedied in specific situation. In the United
States, court recognizes that admission is part of university autonomy and academic freedom, but refuses to give
complete deference to judgement concluded with discretion. Based on clauses in administrative laws and the
Constitution, court constructs judicial review standards from being deferential to stringent. Standards are applied in
different cases to solve disputes about process and classification raised in admission evaluation, which reasonably
allocates burden of proof. It is necessary for Chinese court to heighten judicial review standards, according to
claims and circumstances in different cases. On this occasion, to insure equity and justice of admission, court is
supposed to give more attention to substantive due process in admission evaluation and moderately review logic
process in concluding that judgement |
